METHODS IN GIJJAK EDUCATION: TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT AND ARTISTIC INTERPRETATION
Abstract
The article discusses the methodological principles of teaching the Uzbek gijjak in professional music education, with the focus on two sides of the student's growth: technical command of the instrument and artistic interpretation. As a bowed instrument with its own kind of technique, its flexible, expressive intonation and its important place in traditional ensembles, the gijjak makes particular demands on the teacher. We examine the main components of gijjak training: position of the instrument, control of the bow, left-hand technique, intonation, rhythmic stability and sound production. Special attention is paid to how traditional performance practice and academic teaching methods can be brought together. The pedagogical framework we propose rests on demonstration and imitation, technical exercises, analysis of repertoire, ensemble work and the student's independent practice. We also stress the need to develop the student's ear and understanding of traditional melodic structures. Our conclusion is that gijjak teaching should unite technical accuracy, stylistic awareness and artistic individuality while keeping the cultural foundations of Uzbek instrumental performance intact.
Keywords
gijjak, bowed-string instrument, instrumental education, bow technique, intonation, maqom, music pedagogy.How to Cite
References
Абдурашидова, Д. (2025). АРУЗ И МУЗЫКА: КАК РИТМИЧЕСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ДУТАРА ПОМОГАЕТ ОСВОЕНИЮ РИТМИКИ СТИХА. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета, 18-28.
Abdurashidova, D. (2025). О способах извлечения звуков на дутаре и их обозначении: On the Methods of Sound Production on the Dutor and Their Notation. Journal of national culture (JNC), 1(2), 11-20.
Campbell, P. S. (2004). Teaching music globally: Experiencing music, expressing culture. Oxford University Press.
Kadirov, U. (2026). Sharq maqomoti ta’limida g’ijjakning o’rni: The role of the ghijjak in the teaching of Eastern maqam traditions. Journal of National Culture. https://doi.org/10.64681/drhbha31
Kenzhebaeva, S. S. (2025). The history of the origin of the musical instruments violin and gidjak. Art and Culture Bulletin, (1). https://doi.org/10.66900/3kn9gz52
Makharov, N., Radjabova, D., Abdurashidova, D., & Khandamyan, V. S. (2025). Кросс-культурная синергия в музыке: Пути сотрудничества между узбекскими и кувейтскими композиторами. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета, 38–45.
Nettl, B. (2015). The study of ethnomusicology: Thirty-three discussions (3rd ed.). University of Illinois Press.
Niyazbayeva, A. (2026). Organological and constructive features of the Uzbek ghijjak and the Karakalpak girjek: A comparative analysis. Yangi O’zbekiston, Yangi Tadqiqotlar Jurnali, 5(6).
Расулов, Д. А., Хасанов, А. Т., Махаров, Н. Т., Хасанова, Г. Д., & Сафаров, А. У. (2026). От макома к симфонии: пути художественной трансформации национальной традиции в узбекской музыке: теоретико-методологический, исторический и композиторский аспекты. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета, 45-59.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Utkur Kadirov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Art and Design: Social Science